CMA CGM undertakes to make its websites, intranet, extranet and software packages ac-cessible [and its mobile applications and digital street furniture] in accordance with Article 47 of Law No. 2005-102 of 11 February 2005.

To this end, it implements the following strategy and actions:

• Multi-year accessibility plan 2024-2026 : CMA CGM is currently working on a comprehen-sive remediation plan for all of its assets, which will result in a detailed roadmap for 2024-2026 by the end of 2025. Group Multiyear Accessibility Plan 2025-2027 VF.docx
• Actions carried out in 2025, audit of the MyCeva application and creation of: audit report, coding tips, design guidelines to help the application teams remediate issues.

This accessibility statement applies to : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en

Compliance Status

https://www.cevalogistics.com/en is in partial compliance with the General Accessibility Im-provement Framework (RGAA), version 4.1.2 due to the non-conformances listed in the audit report file.

Test results

The compliance audit conducted by IBM Consulting reveals that:

• 61.42% of the criteria of the RGAA version 4 are met

Non-compliant critera

List of no-compliant criteria

1.           Criteria 1.1: Is there a text alternative for every image that provides information?

2.           Criteria 1.2: Is every decorative image correctly ignored by assistive technologies?

3.           Criteria 1.3: For each information-bearing image with a text alternative, is this alternative relevant (excluding special cases)?

4.           Criteria 3.1: In each web page, the information should not be given solely by colour. Was that rule respected?

5.           Criteria 3.2: In each web page, is the contrast between the color of the text and the color of its background high enough (except in special cases)?

6.           Criteria 3.3: In each web page, are the colors used in the interface components or graphic elements that carry information sufficiently contrasted (except in special cases)?

7.           Criteria 6.2 In each web page, does each link have a title?

8.           Criteria 7.1: Is every script compatible with assistive technologies, if necessary?

9.           Criteria 7.3: Can each script be controlled from the keyboard or any other pointing device (except in special cases)?

10.        Criteria 7.4 For each script that initiates a context change, is the user warned or in control?

11.        Criteria 7.5: On each web page, are status messages correctly rendered by assistive technologies?

12.        Criteria 9.1: Is the information on each web page structured by the appropriate use of headings?

13.        Criteria 9.2. In each web page, is the structure of the document consistent (outside special cases)?

14.        Criteria 9.4 In every web page, is every quote correctly indicated?

15.        Criteria  10.4 In each web page, does the text remain legible when the font size is increased by at least 200% (except in special cases)?

16.        Criteria 10.7 In every web page, for each element receiving focus, is the focus visible?

17.        Criteria 10.8: For every web page, is hidden content intended to be ignored by assistive technologies?

18.        Criteria 10.11: For each web page, can the content be presented without loss of information or functionality and without resorting to either vertical scrolling for a window with a height of 256 px, or horizontal scrolling for a window with a width of 320 px (except in special cases)?

19.        Criteria 10.12: In each web page, can the text spacing properties be redefined by the user without loss of content or functionality (except in special cases)?

20.        Criteria 10.13 In each web page, is the additional content that appears when focusing or hovering over an interface component controllable by the user (except in special cases)?

21.        Criteria 11.1: Does each form field have a label?

22.        Criteria 11.9 In each form, is the title of each button relevant (except in special cases)?

23.        Criteria 11.10 Is the input check used in each form in a relevant way (except in special cases)?

24.        Criteria 12.6 Can content clustering areas across multiple web pages (header, main navigation, main content, footer, and search engine areas) be reached or avoided?

25.        Criteria 12.7 Is there a skip or quick access link to the main content area in each web page (except in special cases)?

26.        Criteria 12.8: Is the tab order consistent on every web page?

27.        Criteria 13.3 In each web page, does each office document for download have, if necessary, an accessible version (except in special cases)?

Exemptions for disproportionate burden

• Not applicable

Content not subject to the accessibility obligation

• Not applicable

Establishment of this accessibility statement

This declaration was shared by IBM Consulting to CMA CGM on 17/10/2025.

Technologies used to create cevalogistics.cma-cgm.com

• HTML5
• CSS
• JavaScript

Test environment

Content restitution checks were performed based on the combination provided by the RGAA 4 baseline, with the following versions:

• Chrome Browser : v137.0.7151.105
• NVDA : v2025.1.2

Tools to assess accessibility

• Color Contrast Analyzer: v3.5.2
• NVDA: v2025.1.2
• Physical Keyboard
• Equal Access Accessibility Checker Version: v4.0.4
• Chrome Browser: v137.0.7151.105*

Pages of the site that have been verified for compliance
 

1.           PAGE1 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en 

2.           PAGE2 : https://www.cevlogistic.com/en/contact-us

3.           PAGE3 : https://www.cevlogistic.com/en/accessibility-statement

4.           PAGE4 : https://www.cevlogistic.com/en/terms-and-conditions

5.           PAGE5 : https://www.cevlogistic.com/en/sitemap

6.           PAGE6 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/what-we-do

7.           PAGE7 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/news-and-media

8.           PAGE8 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/your-industry

9.           PAGE9 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/who-we-are/case-studies

10.        PAGE10 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/ceva-insights

11.        PAGE11 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/ceva-trak

12.        PAGE12 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/ceva-trak?reference_query=WEB9EDKG3423&reference_type_query=HB&matched_reference_number=WEB9EDKG3423&matched_reference_type=HouseBillNumber&brokerage=true&brokerage_type=CEVA_PAPERS&module=AO&search_type=myceva

13.        PAGE13 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/request-a-quote

14.        PAGE14 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/request-a-quote?step=info

15.        PAGE15 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/downloads-and-forms

16.        PAGE16 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/careers

17.        PAGE17 : https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/myceva

Feedback and contact

If you are unable to access any content or service, you can contact ho.digaccess@cma-cgm.com to be directed to an accessible alternative or to obtain the content in another form.

Recourse

Under French law, this procedure is to be used in the following case :

You have reported to the website manager a lack of accessibility that prevents you from ac-cessing any of the content or services of the portal and you have not received a satisfactory response.

• Write a message to the Defender of Rights [https://formulaire.defenseurdesdroits.fr/]
• Contact the delegate of the Defender of Rights in your region [https://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/saisir/delegues]
• Send a letter by post (free, do not put a stamp) Defender of RightsFree response 7112075342 Paris CEDEX 07